Entra ID (Azure AD) Security Assessment
Cloud identity is the new perimeter. We assess your Entra ID tenant for conditional-access gaps, over-privileged roles and consent-phishing exposure that lead to tenant compromise.
What is Entra ID (Azure AD) Security Assessment?
Cloud identity is the new perimeter, and it fails differently from on-prem AD. We assess your Entra ID tenant for conditional-access gaps, over-privileged roles and consent-phishing exposure that lead straight to tenant compromise.
Cloud identity fails differently from on-prem AD, and the failures are often invisible: a user consents to a malicious app, a privileged role sits unmanaged without just-in-time controls, a conditional-access policy has a legacy-auth hole. Any one can hand an attacker tenant-wide reach. We assess your Entra ID tenant for exactly these gaps — the ones behind a growing share of real cloud breaches.
Entra ID assessments also address the reality that identity is now the primary control plane for most organisations' data. Email, files, applications and administrative power all hang off it, so a single identity compromise can be equivalent to a full breach. Testing the tenant's configuration and privileged access is testing the modern crown jewels directly.
Entra ID (Azure AD) Security Assessment is a manual, exploit-driven assessment: real people attacking your target the way an adversary would, then proving each finding with a working proof of concept. It is not an automated scan with a logo on it — the point is to find and demonstrate the issues that actually put you at risk, and hand your team a clear plan to fix them.
Why it matters
Identity is the modern perimeter. One escalation path through Active Directory or your identity provider can hand an attacker the keys to every connected system, which is why these attacks appear in almost every major breach.
A entra id (azure ad) security assessment engagement replaces guesswork with evidence. Instead of hoping your controls hold, you get a ranked, reproducible picture of where they don’t — before someone hostile finds the same gaps.
Industries & use cases
Entra ID assessments suit Microsoft 365 and Azure-centric organisations, hybrid-identity enterprises, and regulated sectors moving sensitive workloads to the cloud.
What we test
Manual, exploit-driven coverage focused on real impact — not scanner noise.
- Conditional access gaps and bypasses
- Privileged role and PIM review
- Application consent and OAuth abuse
- Hybrid identity and sync attacks
- Guest and external access risks
- MFA coverage and bypass paths
Signs you should run a entra id (azure ad) security assessment
If any of these apply, testing is overdue.
- You run Microsoft 365 / Entra ID
- You have many applications and service principals
- You're unsure how much privileged access exists
- You allow guest and external collaboration
- You've had or fear a consent-phishing incident
Common vulnerabilities we find
The issues that show up again and again in entra id (azure ad) security assessment — and the ones that actually get exploited.
Consent phishing
A malicious OAuth app granted broad delegated permissions.
Privileged role sprawl
Standing Global Admin and unmanaged PIM roles.
Conditional access gaps
Policies bypassable by legacy auth or device tricks.
Legacy authentication enabled
Protocols that bypass modern MFA and conditional access.
Guest and external over-access
External identities with more reach into your tenant than intended.
Unmanaged privileged accounts
Global Admins and privileged roles without PIM, MFA or monitoring.
Application over-permissions
Registered apps and service principals with excessive Graph permissions.
Weak external collaboration settings
Guest and cross-tenant access broader than intended.
Example attack chain
Real impact rarely comes from one bug — it comes from chaining several. A representative example:
Why choose webhook.press
Attacker mindset
We’re offensive security people who also build the free tools bug-bounty hunters use daily. We test the way real adversaries do — and prove it.
No scanner theatre
You get findings a human exploited and verified, ranked by real business risk — not an unfiltered tool dump padded to look thorough.
Fixed price, free retest
A clear quote after scoping, a report your team and auditors can use, and a free retest to confirm the fixes hold.
Our methodology
A structured, transparent process aligned to OWASP and PTES — with a named point of contact throughout.
Scoping & rules of engagement
We agree the exact targets, depth, timing and constraints for your entra id (azure ad) security assessment, and set clear rules of engagement so testing is safe and predictable.
Reconnaissance & mapping
We enumerate the full attack surface — endpoints, roles, technologies and trust boundaries — and threat-model where an attacker would focus.
Manual testing & exploitation
We attack by hand, verifying and chaining weaknesses into real impact. Automated tooling supports coverage; humans find the logic and authorization bugs it can’t.
Analysis & risk rating
Each finding is validated, rated by real business risk rather than raw scanner severity, and de-duplicated so you get signal, not noise.
Reporting
You receive an executive summary for leadership and a technical section with reproducible PoCs, evidence and concrete, stack-specific remediation.
Free retest
After you remediate, we re-test the closed findings to confirm they are actually fixed — at no extra cost.
What you get
Reproducible PoCs
Every finding ships with a working proof and step-by-step reproduction your engineers can replay and verify.
Risk-ranked findings
Prioritised by real business impact, so you fix what matters first instead of drowning in low-severity noise.
Actionable remediation
Concrete, stack-specific fixes and guidance — not generic “apply best practice” filler.
Free retest
We re-check the closed findings after remediation and confirm they’re resolved.
The report is written for two audiences at once: an executive summary that a non-technical stakeholder can act on, and a detailed technical section — findings, evidence, CVSS and reproduction — that your developers and auditors can use directly.
Manual testing, not just a scan
Automated scanners are fast and useful for coverage, but they only find patterns they already know, and they flood you with false positives. They cannot understand your business logic, chain several small issues into a breach, or tell you which alert actually matters. Our entra id (azure ad) security assessment is led by experienced testers who exploit findings by hand and rank them by the damage they’d really do — the difference between a 300-page tool dump and a short list of things worth fixing.
Standards & compliance
Our entra id (azure ad) security assessment reports are written to support the frameworks your auditors and customers care about — including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and the EU’s NIS2 and DORA. Each engagement produces clear, independent evidence of testing with scope, methodology and findings documented the way assessors expect, so the same test both hardens your systems and helps satisfy your obligations.
Frameworks we follow
Recognised methodologies, adapted to your target — never a rigid checklist.
- OWASP — Web Security Testing Guide, ASVS and the API Security Top 10
- PTES — the Penetration Testing Execution Standard
- NIST SP 800-115 — technical guide to security testing
- OSSTMM — Open Source Security Testing Methodology Manual
- MITRE ATT&CK — to frame real-world adversary techniques
FAQ
Hybrid AD + Entra?
Yes — sync and trust between on-prem AD and Entra is a common, high-impact attack path we cover.
Do you test conditional access?
Yes — we look for the gaps and bypasses that undermine your access policies.
Do you test conditional access?
Yes — we look for the gaps and bypasses that quietly undermine your access policies.
Do you cover hybrid AD + Entra?
Yes — the sync and trust between them is a common, high-impact attack path.
Do you review application permissions?
Yes — over-permissioned apps and service principals are a leading Entra ID compromise path.
Do you assess privileged access management?
Yes — standing privilege without just-in-time controls is a primary finding we look for.
How long does a entra id (azure ad) security assessment take?
Most focused engagements run one to two weeks depending on scope; we agree the exact timeline during scoping.
Is a retest included?
Yes — after you remediate, we re-check the closed findings to confirm they’re fixed, at no extra cost.
How do you price it?
Per engagement, based on scope and depth — you get a fixed quote after a short scoping call. No cookie-cutter packages.
Related services
Why teams trust our entra id (azure ad) security assessment
Aligned to recognised standards
Testing follows OWASP, PTES, NIST SP 800-115 and MITRE ATT&CK, and reports support SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, NIS2 and DORA.
Every engagement includes
Reproducible PoCs, risk-ranked findings, concrete remediation, a named point of contact, a free retest, and a summary letter of attestation.
Confidential by default
Work is covered by an NDA, scoped with clear rules of engagement, and data is handled with care throughout — including residency requirements.
Sample report available on request — see our reporting format and depth before you commit. Ask for a sample →
Get a quote for Entra ID (Azure AD) Security Assessment
Tell us about the target — we’ll come back with scope and a fixed price. Manual, exploit-driven testing with reproducible proof and a free retest.